and how we misinterpret them:
Blog en español
Interesting books
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- January 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
Categories
- banks
- behavior
- capitalism
- communism
- control
- crisis
- democracy
- economy
- education
- elections
- europe
- fakes
- freaks
- free markets
- freedom
- government
- hayek
- history
- humor
- inflation
- internet
- interventionism
- labor
- Law
- libertarianism
- media
- mises
- money
- monopoly
- music
- news
- nonsense
- Phylosophy of Liberty
- politicians
- property
- protectionism
- quotes
- Rand
- rights
- rothbard
- Sin categorÃa
- socialism
- spending
- state
- stimulus
- subsidies
- taxation
- terrorism
- USA
- videos
- war
- warnings
- welfare
- welfare state
Meta
That image mirrors quite exactly Rothbard’s “Left and right” of course – and “mirrors” is to be understood quite literally, as Rothbard saw anarchism as the most left-wing movement, and national socialism and stalinism as the most right-wing.
See here: http://mises.org/daily/2099
and for the original text:
Click to access 1_1_2.pdf
😉
Well… left and right do not really define anything, not even where they are sit, as being on the left at the French Assembly 200 something years ago might not be an accurate way of defining the ideas of who are sit now on the left (or the right) in the American Congress, the British Parliament, etc.
In any case I am starting to be worried about the fact that Rothbard places me on the “left”..
😀